Tim Geithner is "calling for the G-20 nations to continue growth initiatives," according to the main stream media. Geithner's idea of growth initiatives is to fatten the paychecks of currently employed public employees, which is essentially what constituted the $ 800 billion Obama-Pelosi-Reid package enacted in early 2009 "to prevent unemployment from reaching 8 percent.". Now with unemployment 25 percent higher than the Obama 8 percent target, Geithner and Obama would like to do more of the same. Even Europe's not buying the Geithner message any more. The G-20 Summit's concluding report emphasized debt reduction and getting one's fiscal house in order. Only the US is pushing for more spending and higher sovereign debt levels.
The Congress and the American public aren't buying it either. The public wants a fiscal about-face. Obama is increasingly isolated from reality and from the American public. Now, he seems to be losing his European fan base as well. Even the British public no longer consider that they have a "special relationship" with the US. In two short years, Obama and Geithner have have become shrill voices with an ever diminishing audience.
Sunday, 27 June 2010
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
China's metallic gift to India - appreciation of Yuan
After a long global political battle, China’s decision to open (appreciate) its currency have come as a breather for metal prices, but the long-term impact of Yuan appreciation on metals prices may not be as simple as it looks.
China’s purchasing power in the international markets will increase along with the Yuan’s appreciation. China’s demand for commodities is driven by multiple factors such as real demand from manufacturers, construction industry and stockpiling besides speculative demand from traders. However alignment to bulk orders may not encourage buying based on real demand due to appreciation.
China being the world’s largest importer of metals and ores, appreciation of Yuan will lower the import price of metals for Chinese importers and manufacturers. This will potentially help push up international prices of these commodities (including in India). This is a positive development for Indian metal and ore producers.
However, purchases are eventually determined by demand. Metal prices are already heading southwards due to concerns over sustainability of strong consumption in China. Any slowing down in Chinese economy may lead to no rise in international metal prices despite the appreciation in the Yuan. Although, downside from current level of $1,968/tonne for aluminium and $1,777/tonne for zinc is limited as prices are near the marginal cost of production.
For now, Indian metal companies and investors can only be positive courtesy China.
Reference: The Economic Times, Kolkata, 23-Jun-2010
China’s purchasing power in the international markets will increase along with the Yuan’s appreciation. China’s demand for commodities is driven by multiple factors such as real demand from manufacturers, construction industry and stockpiling besides speculative demand from traders. However alignment to bulk orders may not encourage buying based on real demand due to appreciation.
China being the world’s largest importer of metals and ores, appreciation of Yuan will lower the import price of metals for Chinese importers and manufacturers. This will potentially help push up international prices of these commodities (including in India). This is a positive development for Indian metal and ore producers.
However, purchases are eventually determined by demand. Metal prices are already heading southwards due to concerns over sustainability of strong consumption in China. Any slowing down in Chinese economy may lead to no rise in international metal prices despite the appreciation in the Yuan. Although, downside from current level of $1,968/tonne for aluminium and $1,777/tonne for zinc is limited as prices are near the marginal cost of production.
For now, Indian metal companies and investors can only be positive courtesy China.
Reference: The Economic Times, Kolkata, 23-Jun-2010
Saturday, 19 June 2010
November Nears
It is interesting how Congress has suddenly developed an aversion to spending, as the November elections approach. Twice in the past week, Obama-sponsored bailouts of profligate state governments with padded public payrolls have failed in the Senate. I guess public opinion is finally beginning to matter to everyone except the President. Of course, he's not on the ballot this year, so his interest in fiscal discipline won't surface until the Spring of 2012.
The moribund economic recovery, made weaker by the President's policies, is barely limping along. The BP oil spill and the President's self-destructive moratorium on offshore drilling, only make matters worse. The only part of the economy with vigorous growth is the incredible expansion of government. The private sector has retreated into it's shell. Businesses have learned that they can do more with fewer employees, a lesson they won't soon forget. As all Americans face staggeringly higher taxes next year and staggeringly higher health care costs, direct results of the President's legislative accomplishments, don't expect much in 2011.
You might think that Democratic losses in November might get through to the White House, but I doubt it. The White House seems to be in a world of it's own, where reality never seems to intrude.
The moribund economic recovery, made weaker by the President's policies, is barely limping along. The BP oil spill and the President's self-destructive moratorium on offshore drilling, only make matters worse. The only part of the economy with vigorous growth is the incredible expansion of government. The private sector has retreated into it's shell. Businesses have learned that they can do more with fewer employees, a lesson they won't soon forget. As all Americans face staggeringly higher taxes next year and staggeringly higher health care costs, direct results of the President's legislative accomplishments, don't expect much in 2011.
You might think that Democratic losses in November might get through to the White House, but I doubt it. The White House seems to be in a world of it's own, where reality never seems to intrude.
Thursday, 10 June 2010
Obama Takes a Dangerous Left Turn
In an earlier blog, I defended Obama's initial reaction to the BP Oil Spill, but criticism from the political talking heads -- right and left -- have caused an abrupt shift in Obama policy toward the spill.
What should the government's response be? The government should declare that this is a two-part national disaster: Part I -- fix the leak; Part II -- prepare defenses for the environment to protect beaches, fisheries, wetlands, whatever is threatened by the spill. These are two separate activities. On Part I. BP had (but no longer, see below) enormous economic incentives to fix the leak and were working feverishly to do so. If BP plugs the leak, they can potentially save enormous amounts of money in liability and clean up costs. That is, until yesterday.
Yesterday, Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, announced that BP should be responsible for all the layoffs that result from Obama's six month suspension of off shore drilling. That changed the incentives. If BP is responsible for bad policies enacted by the US after the spill, then they probably face bankruptcy. Whether they fix the leak or not may not matter to BP's future. BP may be toast no matter what. That dramatically alters their incentives to fix this leak. Big mistake by Salazar and, of course, by Obama. John McCain, not to be outdone in bi-partisan stupidity, quickly chimed in on the Larry Kudlow CNBC show last night that he supports making BP responsible for anyone laid off by the Obama drilling suspension directive. Thanks John. Good thing we didn't elect you president.
As for the clean up, here, the administration could show some real leadership. They could bring together environmentalists, including those of the far left, and fisherman, and oil cleanup experts from the industry and fashion a play to save our beaches and our shoreline. Instead, Obama is playing golf and laying plans to increase taxes big oil (and further alienate the oil industry, just at a time when he needs their help). By exerting real leadership Obama could bring the country into a unified effort to save our environment. Instead it's politics as usual, divide one from another, and villify any easy targets you can find.
The net effect of Obama policies will be to beggar pensioners in the UK and in the US (BP is a big pension dividend payer to lower and middle income Brits and Americans), to terrify the oil industry and move offshore drilling to other countries (with much more lax regulation, which means much more of a threat to the environment). Companies will be spending more time trying to figure out how to ward off the Obama threat to their existence and less concern on how to contain the oil spill and prepare to defend our coasts.
The Obama policy is now set on this disastrous course and the US (and the Brits) will suffer greatly. Obama has not even spoken once to Tony Hayward, the CEO of BP! That is an amazing fact. When quizzed about this, Obama says, and I paraphrase, I don't want to hear his lies. That should ensure Hayward's cooperation.
Obama only understands confrontation. He has no experience in dealing with conflicting and complicated problems and little understanding about how to unify people around a common theme. In short, Obama is a disaster. The result will be much, much higher energy prices for Americans, more job losses and more political division. As for the environment, the absence of a unifying program to defend our environment will prove to be disastrous in the end and destroy the hopes and the livelihoods of the Americans dependent for lifestyle and sustenance on our southern coasts. (I guess if it reaches NYC, Obama might begin to show some serious interest). It probably means the effective end of the Obama Administration. Growing number of Americans, including many prominent Democrats, are now openly questioning Obama's competence. He will not recover from this.
It could have been so different.
What should the government's response be? The government should declare that this is a two-part national disaster: Part I -- fix the leak; Part II -- prepare defenses for the environment to protect beaches, fisheries, wetlands, whatever is threatened by the spill. These are two separate activities. On Part I. BP had (but no longer, see below) enormous economic incentives to fix the leak and were working feverishly to do so. If BP plugs the leak, they can potentially save enormous amounts of money in liability and clean up costs. That is, until yesterday.
Yesterday, Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, announced that BP should be responsible for all the layoffs that result from Obama's six month suspension of off shore drilling. That changed the incentives. If BP is responsible for bad policies enacted by the US after the spill, then they probably face bankruptcy. Whether they fix the leak or not may not matter to BP's future. BP may be toast no matter what. That dramatically alters their incentives to fix this leak. Big mistake by Salazar and, of course, by Obama. John McCain, not to be outdone in bi-partisan stupidity, quickly chimed in on the Larry Kudlow CNBC show last night that he supports making BP responsible for anyone laid off by the Obama drilling suspension directive. Thanks John. Good thing we didn't elect you president.
As for the clean up, here, the administration could show some real leadership. They could bring together environmentalists, including those of the far left, and fisherman, and oil cleanup experts from the industry and fashion a play to save our beaches and our shoreline. Instead, Obama is playing golf and laying plans to increase taxes big oil (and further alienate the oil industry, just at a time when he needs their help). By exerting real leadership Obama could bring the country into a unified effort to save our environment. Instead it's politics as usual, divide one from another, and villify any easy targets you can find.
The net effect of Obama policies will be to beggar pensioners in the UK and in the US (BP is a big pension dividend payer to lower and middle income Brits and Americans), to terrify the oil industry and move offshore drilling to other countries (with much more lax regulation, which means much more of a threat to the environment). Companies will be spending more time trying to figure out how to ward off the Obama threat to their existence and less concern on how to contain the oil spill and prepare to defend our coasts.
The Obama policy is now set on this disastrous course and the US (and the Brits) will suffer greatly. Obama has not even spoken once to Tony Hayward, the CEO of BP! That is an amazing fact. When quizzed about this, Obama says, and I paraphrase, I don't want to hear his lies. That should ensure Hayward's cooperation.
Obama only understands confrontation. He has no experience in dealing with conflicting and complicated problems and little understanding about how to unify people around a common theme. In short, Obama is a disaster. The result will be much, much higher energy prices for Americans, more job losses and more political division. As for the environment, the absence of a unifying program to defend our environment will prove to be disastrous in the end and destroy the hopes and the livelihoods of the Americans dependent for lifestyle and sustenance on our southern coasts. (I guess if it reaches NYC, Obama might begin to show some serious interest). It probably means the effective end of the Obama Administration. Growing number of Americans, including many prominent Democrats, are now openly questioning Obama's competence. He will not recover from this.
It could have been so different.
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
What Should Be Happening
Had there been a simple, across the board, tax cut for all Americans and all American companies, and had there been no stimulus package, no credit card reform, no FinReg, no Obamacare, the economy would be chugging along, creating between 500,000 and 1,000,000 jobs a month. That's what normally happens in a recovery in Post World War II USA.
Obama has changed all of that. We now are more like Europe: economic stagnation, slow and virtually non-existent economic growth, burgeoning sovereign debt, suffocating employer mandates, and unsustainable entitlements. Don't expect real economic recovery any time soon. We are in serious economic trouble as a nation, brought on by the worst set of economic policies in the nation's history.
It did not need to be that way. Had Obama played a little more golf and a little less time in front the mirror, the US economy would be well on its way. But, alas, Obama intervened and here we are.
Obama has changed all of that. We now are more like Europe: economic stagnation, slow and virtually non-existent economic growth, burgeoning sovereign debt, suffocating employer mandates, and unsustainable entitlements. Don't expect real economic recovery any time soon. We are in serious economic trouble as a nation, brought on by the worst set of economic policies in the nation's history.
It did not need to be that way. Had Obama played a little more golf and a little less time in front the mirror, the US economy would be well on its way. But, alas, Obama intervened and here we are.
Save Money, Save Environment, Improve health, Reduce Carbon Footprint
As a continuation to my previous post on reducing carbon footprint, I hope there have been some viewers to the post and at least some who are doing their bit in reducing carbon footprint.
CYCLE to WORK
This is yet another way of reducing carbon foot print. And for those who don't give a damn to reducing carbon footprint, this will certainly save you money, here are reasons why you should cycle to work.
CYCLE to WORK
This is yet another way of reducing carbon foot print. And for those who don't give a damn to reducing carbon footprint, this will certainly save you money, here are reasons why you should cycle to work.
- It does not cost you fuel, it is eco-friendly
- It improves health and you dont even have to spend multiple grands at the Gym.
- Bicycling is no more a "middle class" or "lower class" trait. And anyways, to protect your "image", you can always buy a high end bicycle.
- It portrays you as a responsible citizen, improving social image. You can proudly say you are doing this to save environment.
Sunday, 6 June 2010
Jobs and the President
Last week, two days before the Labor Department's official release of May employment data, the President was gushing over the employment numbers that were soon to be released. Seemed like an abuse of "insider trading" rules for the President to give an early indication that the number would be "terrific." Market analysts, following the President's lead, began to forecast 500,000 to 750,000 new jobs for the May report. The stock market rallied 230 points based upon Obama's presumed leak of the wonderful employment report. But, Friday, as night follows day, the report was released at long last. The result: disaster!
41,000 private sector jobs were created in the month of May. If that pace continues, the unemployment rate will find its way to 20 percent in time. The total number of jobs created was 431,000 but that included 411,000 temporary Census workers, whose jobs disappear soon.
It is obvious, in retrospect, that the President thought this employmnent report was a "good" report, 431,000 new jobs, and is not bothered by the fact that 95 % of the new jobs are temporary Census worker jobs. This reaction by the President once again demonstrates his contempt for the private sector. It doesn't bother the President that the private sector is not creating jobs. He seems to think another stimulus (pumping up the compensation of public sector employees) is the right answer). The combination of Obama's contempt for private enterprise and free markets and his lack of understanding of economics is shining through.
Meanwhile, when the financial markets discovered the truth, the market suffered once of its worst days in history, dropping 325 points. The market cannot be fooled, even by a glib and ignorant President.
41,000 private sector jobs were created in the month of May. If that pace continues, the unemployment rate will find its way to 20 percent in time. The total number of jobs created was 431,000 but that included 411,000 temporary Census workers, whose jobs disappear soon.
It is obvious, in retrospect, that the President thought this employmnent report was a "good" report, 431,000 new jobs, and is not bothered by the fact that 95 % of the new jobs are temporary Census worker jobs. This reaction by the President once again demonstrates his contempt for the private sector. It doesn't bother the President that the private sector is not creating jobs. He seems to think another stimulus (pumping up the compensation of public sector employees) is the right answer). The combination of Obama's contempt for private enterprise and free markets and his lack of understanding of economics is shining through.
Meanwhile, when the financial markets discovered the truth, the market suffered once of its worst days in history, dropping 325 points. The market cannot be fooled, even by a glib and ignorant President.
Friday, 4 June 2010
Employment Insurance or Unemployment Insurance
Unemployment Insurance or Employment Insurance as it is called in some countries provides temporary financial assistance for unemployed citizens while they look for work. In times of distress such as the global financial crisis when people get laid off, this is an effective way to protect people financially, well to an extent at least.
At the same time this does not promote or encourage unemployment among people.
HOW IT WORKS?This insurance is not applicable for people who have not started working yet. This only applies if you were working as an employee.EligibilityGenerally you need to be ‘qualified’ to be insured. Qualification includes
Insurable hours - Continuous period of work for a certain minimum hours (eg. 52 weeks)
Unemployment – you need to be without work and without pay for some minimum days (eg 7 days)
No fault – you should have been fired for no fault of yours and should not have left the job without any ‘valid’ reason.
Insurance Premium:A portion of salary (e.g. 2%) is deducted with your paycheck. Your employer contributes a certain percentage (generally twice your contribution) and deposits this with the government.
Payback:
At the same time this does not promote or encourage unemployment among people.
HOW IT WORKS?This insurance is not applicable for people who have not started working yet. This only applies if you were working as an employee.EligibilityGenerally you need to be ‘qualified’ to be insured. Qualification includes
Insurable hours - Continuous period of work for a certain minimum hours (eg. 52 weeks)
Unemployment – you need to be without work and without pay for some minimum days (eg 7 days)
No fault – you should have been fired for no fault of yours and should not have left the job without any ‘valid’ reason.
Insurance Premium:A portion of salary (e.g. 2%) is deducted with your paycheck. Your employer contributes a certain percentage (generally twice your contribution) and deposits this with the government.
Payback:
When you get laid off, depending on how long you worked, your last drawn salary and circumstances which led you to be unemployed, you can be compensated from basic needs to up to 80% of your last drawn salary for a certain period (e.g ranging from 20 to 50 weeks).
When you get another job, you just need to inform the insurer (the government agency) about your employment and they stop crediting the amount to your bank account.
How much will you receive?The basic benefit rate ranges from 50% to 80% of your last drawn salary (or in many cases, 55% of your average insured earnings) with a maximum yearly cap. Generally this is a taxable income.
Most people are protected by this insurance while some others make arrangements with their employers and enjoy long term unpaid vacations as their finance needs are taken care of by the employment insurance paychecks they claim. They can get fired and re-join the same employer after the vacation.
When you get another job, you just need to inform the insurer (the government agency) about your employment and they stop crediting the amount to your bank account.
How much will you receive?The basic benefit rate ranges from 50% to 80% of your last drawn salary (or in many cases, 55% of your average insured earnings) with a maximum yearly cap. Generally this is a taxable income.
Most people are protected by this insurance while some others make arrangements with their employers and enjoy long term unpaid vacations as their finance needs are taken care of by the employment insurance paychecks they claim. They can get fired and re-join the same employer after the vacation.
Regardless, in times of distress, this serves as a healthy tool for people to protect themselves financially of they are laid off, need to upgrade their skills or are pregnant and need extended leave.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)